Which way?

[wokingcardinal]

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AWRQj-kifK8

Yeah, that’s pretty conclusive!

he was just getting the mud off his boots

[Growler]

Yeah, that’s pretty conclusive!

he was just getting the mud off his boots

He quite literally trod on some shit.
*some shit, a shit, whatever.

[top of the C]

So the consensus is, coz he’s one of ours, it was ok for him to calmly walk over and (at least attempt to) stamp on the fan (or whatever you want to call him) whilst he was being held down.
I wonder what this board would think if it were the other way around.
Seems morals have no place among football supporters; I’d have thought better of us. Oh well.

[Lurker]

So the consensus is, coz he’s one of ours, it was ok for him to calmly walk over and (at least attempt to) stamp on the fan (or whatever you want to call him) whilst he was being held down.
I wonder what this board would think if it were the other way around.
Seems morals have no place among football supporters; I’d have thought better of us. Oh well.

I believe there's a vacancy at the moment for the position of Archbishop of Canterbury. You and one or two others on here might just be pious enough to stand a chance of landing the gig.

[Meerkat]

So the consensus is, coz he’s one of ours, it was ok for him to calmly walk over and (at least attempt to) stamp on the fan (or whatever you want to call him) whilst he was being held down.
I wonder what this board would think if it were the other way around.
Seems morals have no place among football supporters; I’d have thought better of us. Oh well.

You clearly haven’t read the forum if that is your opinion of the consensus

[JAM]

So the consensus is, coz he’s one of ours, it was ok for him to calmly walk over and (at least attempt to) stamp on the fan (or whatever you want to call him) whilst he was being held down.
I wonder what this board would think if it were the other way around.
Seems morals have no place among football supporters; I’d have thought better of us. Oh well.

was just about to ask if you are new here, but clearly not looking at your join date

[wokingcardinal]

So the consensus is, coz he’s one of ours, it was ok for him to calmly walk over and (at least attempt to) stamp on the fan (or whatever you want to call him) whilst he was being held down.
I wonder what this board would think if it were the other way around.
Seems morals have no place among football supporters; I’d have thought better of us. Oh well.

correct

[Growler]

You know what?!?
I despise the actions of our (former?) captain.

He’s a human being so I’m not going to castigate him. He’s a professional sportsman who plays football for his living, so who am I to ask that he be punished in a way that affects his job??
I’m sure he’s bright enough in his calm moments to know he acted like a moron.
That act was madness. Furious and stupid and reckless. But it was an action of the moment and had no effect on the game.

To me “the game” is the important thing, and the reason we were all there.

That’s why I despise the actions of the feigning fanny from Aldershot. That’s an act of a cheat.
It’s against the spirit of the game, underhand, and all those other naive morals we used to believe in.
There’s no justification for that.
It’s ruined the sporting event.
It’s like losing at monopoly and throwing the board up in the air. He ruined everything only for selfish satisfaction.

So yes, my moral compass does have different points of OUTRAGE.

[Old Woking United]

I mean he's not going to release a statement stating "I stamped ever closer to the man's head but not on it " is he?. Hence the no comment of no comments being as there won't be a comment. The nearly stamp following the near assault on Will and the pitch incursions are not our problem. Cheers

[Old Woking United]

That didn't read right, I mean pitch incursions aside as they will be dealt with other matters between clubs should be sorted out amicably all round. Cheers

[Old Woking United]

I'm not going for 3rd time lucky . Bollox