Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

wfc462
Posts: 723
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:55 am
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by wfc462 » Tue Jan 07, 2025 8:43 pm

we've found our level

Alec Guinness
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:54 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Alec Guinness » Tue Jan 07, 2025 8:46 pm

Yep, I agree with gummybear. There has been some crap on here, from me in particular, but that comment was both disrespectful and distasteful.
All my words come back to me in shades of mediocrity

vinrouge
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:00 am
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by vinrouge » Tue Jan 07, 2025 8:50 pm

3-0 Walker yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssssssssssss

Bristolcard
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:29 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Bristolcard » Tue Jan 07, 2025 8:50 pm

Great stuff. In Ardley we thrust.
Good confidence booster for Lewis

Cards
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 5:52 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Cards » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:14 pm

Anyone know when contes loans up

GlenH
Posts: 2088
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:57 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by GlenH » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:18 pm

Cards wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:14 pm
Anyone know when contes loans up
Original signing article said until the end of the season.

https://www.wokingfc.co.uk/news/article ... nte-signs/

vinrouge
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:00 am
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by vinrouge » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:30 pm

4-0 Ward yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssss

devereux5000
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 7:39 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by devereux5000 » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:35 pm

I don’t think the Premier League commentators would get away with switching off for a couple of minutes to eat a burger. Made me smile.

Card Sharp
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:50 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Card Sharp » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:46 pm

devereux5000 wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:35 pm
I don’t think the Premier League commentators would get away with switching off for a couple of minutes to eat a burger.
But it's not Premier League!

Thought it was quite funny.

The only downside to us winning is that John is too upbeat....there was something pleasing about listening to John's punditry when we are bad....he's more downbeat than me.

devereux5000
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 7:39 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by devereux5000 » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:54 pm

Yes, John’s blood pressure rants in the dying days of Doyle were up there with Mark Kermode rants.

Svend
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:06 am

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Svend » Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:59 pm

Glad to have won that, rather convincing in the end which always helps, winnable tie in the next round too. Could find us in the final 8!

Cruncher
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu May 18, 2023 10:23 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Cruncher » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:10 pm

Oh knock it off, it was a throwaway tongue in cheek comment.

Turns out I was only half right, team was more than strong enough.

Ref was fine, few Radcliffe players may disagree.

Red and White Army
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:53 pm
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Red and White Army » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:22 pm

Very comfortable win. First 25 mins felt like a friendly but we dominated after that. After the subs lost a bit of momentum initially (thought it was strange we brought on so many first choice players when 3-0 up) but finished the game well, walker’s dreadful penalty aside.

Radcliffe offered next to nothing. Their number 4 decided it was the ref’s fault once they went 3-0 down.

It was fucking freezing.

WFC96
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:52 pm
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by WFC96 » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:28 pm

Cruncher wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:10 pm
Oh knock it off, it was a throwaway tongue in cheek comment.

Turns out I was only half right, team was more than strong enough.

Ref was fine, few Radcliffe players may disagree.
Wasn't tongue in cheek, it was sexist. Plain and simple!

Lurker
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 9:04 am
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Lurker » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:31 pm

Bristolcard wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 8:50 pm
In Ardley we thrust.
Now that IS a disrespectful comment.

Two of Diamonds
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2019 8:13 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Two of Diamonds » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:31 pm

First 30 very frustrating as we went back to sideways - backwards - sideways - backwards with the ball ending up at Harries to make a hopeful punt when he can't pass. Even when we got near the box, nobody would shoot. Anyway lo and behold, Walker drops in, gets the ball, turns forward, clips it forward into the box to an unmarked Leahy who scores. Leahey then returns the favour 10 minutes later and essentially game over at that point, but it certainly was 2 mins into the second half.

Radcliffe had some chances late on which they really should have taken but the 870 (less the 26 away) went home happy. Effiong and Ward were excellent when they came on. Thought Leahey played well, Walker much better too and good to see Ince get a start. Conte was 'rusty'...

Stjohn
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:54 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Stjohn » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:44 pm

Two of Diamonds wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:31 pm
First 30 very frustrating as we went back to sideways - backwards - sideways - backwards with the ball ending up at Harries to make a hopeful punt when he can't pass. Even when we got near the box, nobody would shoot. Anyway lo and behold, Walker drops in, gets the ball, turns forward, clips it forward into the box to an unmarked Leahy who scores. Leahey then returns the favour 10 minutes later and essentially game over at that point, but it certainly was 2 mins into the second half.

Radcliffe had some chances late on which they really should have taken but the 870 (less the 26 away) went home happy. Effiong and Ward were excellent when they came on. Thought Leahey played well, Walker much better too and good to see Ince get a start. Conte was 'rusty'...
870 is a decent crowd all things considered like the freezing temperatures

Kingfield Ender
Posts: 8878
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:48 am
Has thanked: 451 times
Been thanked: 394 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Kingfield Ender » Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:57 pm

Dennon Lewis needs to out on loan, shite. Conte, shite

However that's 11 goals in 4 games now. Fair play to the Radcliffe fans but their limited team was no match for even our below strength team

We're the famous Woking FC and we're going to Wemberlee..
Still Plugging away in the absence of the great one

KT15 Card
Posts: 3164
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:52 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by KT15 Card » Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:11 pm

I'd have a female ref over Aaron Farmer any day of the week!

Old Woking Boy
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:18 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Old Woking Boy » Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:14 pm

Kingfield Ender wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:57 pm
Dennon Lewis needs to out on loan, shite. Conte, shite

However that's 11 goals in 4 games now. Fair play to the Radcliffe fans but their limited team was no match for even our below strength team

We're the famous Woking FC and we're going to Wemberlee..
Solihull must have had a real off day to lose to them.

Dennon and Conte definite weak links, although I'm very surprised with Conte, thought he'd offer a lot more.

Walker has found his level.

Currycard
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:13 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Currycard » Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:30 pm

Comfortable 4 nil win and nice to see us continuing to play a better style of football and actually had a game plan which worked. I feel like the whole squad seems happier at the moment (minus Harries as he always seems fuming) but amazing what a new experienced management team can do in a short space of time which gives us more hope for the future. It was definitely useful seeing the squad used tonight and I get Ince and Wynter both coming back from injuries I think they will remain squad players and will cover positions during the season when needed. For me I'd certainly offload Dennon Lewis for the rest of the season on loan as he fails to impress me with his end product and looks a level below and I'd also send Conte back to Cardiff as being a young player at a championship club he should be looking a few levels above (like Luker did) but looks very limited. I think if we add one or two more in January to the squad in addition to Aiden O'brien then I think we will comfortably stay up and hopefully finish strong with NA able to build his own squad next season.

Meerkat
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:14 pm
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Meerkat » Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:43 pm

Who gave Andrews MotM and why?!
Walker scored two and set up two which would make him the obvious choice.

Was it just me or was that penalty somewhat harsh?
And it was bloody freezing walking home!

Wokingcard
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 9:47 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Wokingcard » Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:54 pm

Cruncher wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:10 pm
Oh knock it off, it was a throwaway tongue in cheek comment.

Turns out I was only half right, team was more than strong enough.

Ref was fine, few Radcliffe players may disagree.
Just apologise. You were sexist and rightly got called out

skippy
Posts: 1729
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:08 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by skippy » Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:04 am

KT15 Card wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2025 11:11 pm
I'd have a female ref over Aaron Farmer any day of the week!
Or Wayne Cartmel, Aaron Jackson, Rob Massey-Ellis...

I think our ref tonight was the one that did the women's FA cup final. The game was fairly easy to ref, with only the handbags incident to really manage. Thought the penalty was harsh, looked like his hands were up to protect his face from a smashed ball on a cold night.

I assume Conte doesn't want to be here.

Zippythecard
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:27 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Match Thread Radcliffe H FAT

Post by Zippythecard » Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:35 am

Conte is as far removed from a substitute Berkhoe as you can imagine. Get rid, Walker flattered to deceive - adds. Nothing and when he moves he moves into our own players space, Get rid. Very frustrating as his old man was special. Leahy’s movement suggests there’s something about him. keep and see how he links with Inih. Denon was he playing? A time to shine and he spent his time thinking he was ON Case Amore. Got rid. Apparently a Jones played at left back. Bring back Josh Casey.

A useful game for NA. We can win this with the right personnel and judging by the 1st 4 games we have the right people ego make this happen. come on you cards


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adrian, Bing [Bot], Calluna Card, Daniel C, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 30 guests

Cardboard

Cardsboard.co.uk is not an official message board of Woking Football Club or The Cards Trust, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Please be warned that some posts will contain swear words.

Vanarama National League Club Forums: Aldershot Town | Altrincham | Barnet | Bromley | Chesterfield | Dagenham & Redbridge | Eastleigh | Ebbsfleet United | FC Halifax Town | Gateshead | Hartlepool United | Kidderminster Harriers | Maidenhead United | Oldham Athletic | Oxford City | Rochdale | Solihull Moors | Southend United | Wealdstone | York City

Unofficial League Forums: The Conference Forum

Other Links: Cards Trust - Boost the Budget | wokingfc.co.uk | Surrey Advertiser | Woking News and Mail | BBC Sport - Woking | BBC Football Commentaries