'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Chobham Card
Posts: 1270
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:53 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 28 times

'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by Chobham Card » Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:39 am

According to an exclusive in the Daily Star:
The National League have voted to end their season now due to the coronavirus crisis.

The League held a board meeting yesterday and decided to vote in favour of declaring the season null and void with immediate effect.

League bosses are now holding crunch talks with the FA in a bid to get them to ratify the decision - and confirm the remaining positions to decide who is promoted and relegated.

If the FA agree to the proposal, it means the National League will become the first in the UK to fail to complete the season due to the pandemic that has turned the sporting world upside down.

Current leaders Barrow, along with second placed Harrogate Town, would be promoted to League Two, while Fylde and Chorley would be relegated to the National League North.

But if the Football League campaign fails to reach a conclusion due to the pandemic and no-one is relegated or promoted, the proposal means League Two would have 26 clubs next season.

All professional football has been suspended until April 30 at the earliest, with members of the Premier League and EFL voting last week to try and finish the current campaign - no matter how long it takes.

But those in the National League want to do the opposite - despite the unprecedented move being set to cost hundreds of people their jobs and send clubs in financial meltdown.
EDIT: Similar in The Standard

Lurker
Posts: 914
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 9:04 am
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by Lurker » Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:49 am

The article is clearly contradictory. If the season is declared "null and void", then clearly the top two clubs can't be promoted or the bottom clubs relegated because the season effectively hasn't happened.

KT15 Card
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:52 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by KT15 Card » Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:53 am

Always trust the Daily Star.

Cardinal96
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:01 pm
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by Cardinal96 » Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:35 pm

All it really says is that they may cancel all remaining fixtures, and the papers are only speculating on what that would mean for the league table.

Doesn't make much sense to promote Harrogate in 2nd, when they'd normally have to go through a playoff anyway. I can see Barrow being promoted and Stevenage being saved, unfortunately.

Perhaps bottom placed Chorley relegated and 1 up from each north and south would be fair?

TripWookiees
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by TripWookiees » Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:02 pm

Sure, a strong case could be made for Chorley going down with them being thirteen points adrift but if I was AFC Flyde I'd have something to say given that they're only two points behind Maidenhead with a game in hand. Seems a little unfair and way too "shooting from the hip", if you ask me.

BonnybridgeCard
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:13 pm
Location: Bonnybridge
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by BonnybridgeCard » Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:10 pm

No need to impact Fylde at all, TripWookiees.

If Barrow go up (and no one comes down from L2), and Chorley go down, we need 2 teams up to replace them (1 from each NLN, NLS as suggested) to remain at 24 clubs in the league.

It sounds an adequate (but obvs far from ideal) suggestion, given every other suggestion I've heard has been rubbish or hard to justify for some heavily (and somewhat unfairly) impacted clubs.

AndyT
Posts: 3048
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 197 times

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by AndyT » Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:33 pm

BonnybridgeCard wrote:
Wed Mar 25, 2020 2:10 pm
No need to impact Fylde at all, TripWookiees.

If Barrow go up (and no one comes down from L2), and Chorley go down, we need 2 teams up to replace them (1 from each NLN, NLS as suggested) to remain at 24 clubs in the league.

It sounds an adequate (but obvs far from ideal) suggestion, given every other suggestion I've heard has been rubbish or hard to justify for some heavily (and somewhat unfairly) impacted clubs.
Even if you attempted to finalise the League by using the PPG method Barrow would finish top and Chorley would finish bottom. Therefore the suggestion to promote Barrow (with no relegation from L2) and relegate Chorley does seem a sensible way to conclude matters for the National League.

However if you use this method to decide which team finishes top of North & South and therefore are promoted could cause some fierce argument. The South would be settled as it is now with Wealdstone finishing comfortably ahead of H & W. However York City are currently top but Kings Lynn have 2 games in hand and only 2 points behind. Using PPG these two would swap and Kings Lynn would be promoted. I can't see York agreeing to this without a fight..............

Interesting times ahead me thinks.

Cornwall Card
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:25 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 'National League vote to immediately end season due to coronavirus crisis'

Post by Cornwall Card » Wed Mar 25, 2020 7:38 pm

What may decide it is when clubs say they are in danger of folding without help or an immediate end.
How many in the National League can afford to plod on paying wages and overheads for three months without a bean coming in by way of gate money, and attendant revenues?
You can't have a league without clubs. If the board told its members the same, how could they reasonably object to a halt?
It might not be fair to some, but this is a unique set of circumstances.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests

Cardboard

Cardsboard.co.uk is not an official message board of Woking Football Club or The Cards Trust, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Please be warned that some posts will contain swear words.

Vanarama National League Club Forums: Aldershot Town | Barnet | Barrow | Bromley | Chesterfield | Chorley | Dagenham & Redbridge | Dover Athletic | Eastleigh | Ebbsfleet United | FC Halifax Town | Harrogate Town | Hartlepool United | Maidenhead United | Notts County | Solihull Moors | Stockport County | Sutton United | Torquay United | Wrexham

Unofficial League Forums: The Conference Forum

Other Links: Cards Trust - Boost the Budget | wokingfc.co.uk | Surrey Advertiser | Woking News and Mail | Woking FC Official Photo Gallery | BBC Sport - Woking | BBC Football Commentaries